Preface: This is a little dissertation by a very knowledgable man that goes by the handle of 612.
His web site is 520.org. His view of state-citizenship is flawed. DO
NOT USE it. However, his research on the drivers license and
registration are spot on! If you visit his web site, you're in for a
ride through legal land!
From: 612 <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: September 27, 2010 18:24:38 PM PDT
Subject: Why do people tolerate this?
The mere fact that you get into a car and start the engine makes
you REGULATED UNDER THE VEHICLE CODE. This is what POLICE OFFICERS
believe. This is what Traffic Court Commissioners believe. ANY use
of a car by ANYONE for ANY reason makes them REGULATED UNDER THE
VEHICLE CODE. You can BUY a car without a license. You can BUY
gasoline without a license. You can have the car in your driveway
without a license. You can repair your car without a license. But
you CAN'T USE it for it's design purpose UNLESS YOU GET YOUR
SERVANT'S PERMISSION FIRST.
You HAVE TO ASK for PERMISSION from someone who has NO RIGHT
to be your servant (they had to apply and qualify for the job),
and you HAVE TO PAY THEM for their PERMISSION and then PAY THEM
ANNUALLY in order to continue to possess their PERMISSION to USE
YOUR OWN PROPERTY. In fact you can NEVER OWN A VEHICLE OR MOTOR
VEHICLE ABSOLUTELY. YOU MUST SHARE OWNERSHIP OF YOUR PROPERTY.
And you MUST SHARE OWNERSHIP of your property with your SERVANTS
who's PERMISSION is required before you can USE what you bought. IF
you don't share ownership of your property your SERVANTS will punish
you and FORCE you to share ownership with them.
ASKING is a VOLUNTARY ACT. An APPLICATION is a FORM used to ASK
for something you don't have. IF you want to use a CREDIT CARD to
have to ASK for one using a FORM called an APPLICATION. APPLICATION
is another word for ASKING. Obviously you aren't ENTITLED to a
CREDIT CARD otherwise they'd use a FORM named RECEIPT as opposed
to APPLICATION. You'd sign the RECEIPT once you took possession
of what you were ENTITLED to.
The people have been lied to, repeatedly and it's institutionalized
meaning it's GOVERNMENT POLICY. You CAN NOT OWN (absolutely) or USE
a CAR unless you FIRST get your SERVANT'S PERMISSION. That PERMISSION
is represented by a LICENSE. The LICENSE IS NOT PURCHASED, IT'S
RENTED. The other items issued related to PERMISSION is likewise
rented because it does not belong to the party to whom it was issued.
It's mere indicia that there's a CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP between
the ISSUER and the POSSESSOR. Absent the CONTRACT the POSSESSOR
would not have been issued the items by the ISSUER.
The fact remains, ASKING is a VOLITIONAL act. But when it comes to
cars YOU HAVE TO ASK and RECEIVE PERMISSION before you can LEGALLY
Given the forgoing facts, WHEN did the people's SECURED RIGHT of
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP become forfeit? There MUST BE a point in time
when this happened. WHEN?
Constitution of the State of California We the people of California,
grateful to Almighty; God for our freedom: in order to secure its
blessings, do establish this Constitution. Article I: Declaration
Sec. 1. All men are by nature free and independent, and have certain
unalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending
life and liberty: acquiring, possessing and protecting property:
and pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness.
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
1866. When a statute or instrument is equally susceptible of
two interpretations, one in favor of natural right, and the other
against it, the former is to be adopted.
678. The ownership of property is either:
1. Absolute; or,
679. The ownership of property is absolute when a single person
has the absolute dominion over it, and may use it or dispose of
it according to his pleasure, subject only to general laws.
680. The ownership of property is qualified:
1. When it is shared with one or more persons;
2. When the time of enjoyment is deferred or limited;
3. When the use is restricted. Probate Code §13050(b)
for purposes of this part, all of the following property shall be
excluded in determining the property or estate of the decedent or
(1) Any vehicle registered under division 3 (commencing with Section
4000) of the Vehicle Code or titled under Division 16.5 (commencing
with Section 38000) of the Vehicle Code.
Vehicle Code, Security Interest
Chapter 3. FILING INSTRUMENTS EVIDENCING LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES
Recording of Security interest §6300. Except as provided in
Sections 5905, 5907, and 5908, no security interest in any
vehicle registered under this code, irrespective of whether the
registration was effected prior or subsequent to the creation of
the security interest, is perfected until the secured party or his
or her successor or assignee has deposited , either physically or
by electronic transmission pursuant to Section 1801.1, with the
department, at its office in Sacramento, or at any other office as
may be designated by the director, a properly endorsed certificate
of ownership to the vehicle subject to the security interest showing
the secured party as legal owner if the vehicle is then registered
under this code, or, if the vehicle is not so registered , an
application in usual form for an original registration, together with
an application for registration of the secured party as legal owner,
and upon payment of the fees as provided in this code. Perfection
of Security Interest §6301. When the secured party, his or her
successor, or his or her assignee, has deposited, either physically
or by electronic transmission pursuant to Section 1801.1, with the
department a properly endorsed certificate of ownership showing
the secured party as legal owner or an application in usual form
for an original registration, together with an application for
registration of the secured party as legal owner, the deposit
constitutes perfection of the security interest and the rights of
all persons in the vehicle shall be subject to the provisions of the
Uniform Commercial Code, but the vehicle subject to the security
interest shall be subject to a lien for services and materials as
provided in Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 3068) of Title
14 of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code Why is it preferable
to act contrary to freedom and the secured right to own and enjoy
property. Why is it preferable to pay a servant for a privilege when
the use of the secured right is FREE? Why do people tolerate this?